malaysia bergolak lagi as today dsai was charged for sodomising ones mohd saiful bukhari. Pleaded not guilty and another date was fixed for mention. Bailed was given and dsai is free to walk around pending the coming court case and start campaining for the coming by election.
who is right and who is wrong? let put ourselves in the shoes of the accused and also the said victim. Both have the right to be heard and they should be given a chance to prove their claim. First and foremost, the complainant has to prove his case and i beleived it will not be an easy task. Of course the complainant will be depending on the prosecution team and the investigation by the police. Many parties will be called to testify in order for the prosecution to prove that there is a prima-facie case. It has to be beyond reasonable doubt.
the willingness of the complainant to take an oath under the Quran was something for us to ponder. It's not an easy decision ( i believed ) for someone to do so knowing very well of the implications by doing so if he / she is in the wrong path.
as for the accused (dsai) he will only be called to enter his defence once the court satisfy that there is a case to answer. Forget about the conspiracy, let the court do their job with all their learned officials including lawyers from both parties.
today the so called doctor who examined saiful at pusrawi hospital stand by his finding and he confirmed it with the latest SD.
who is right and who is wrong? let put ourselves in the shoes of the accused and also the said victim. Both have the right to be heard and they should be given a chance to prove their claim. First and foremost, the complainant has to prove his case and i beleived it will not be an easy task. Of course the complainant will be depending on the prosecution team and the investigation by the police. Many parties will be called to testify in order for the prosecution to prove that there is a prima-facie case. It has to be beyond reasonable doubt.
the willingness of the complainant to take an oath under the Quran was something for us to ponder. It's not an easy decision ( i believed ) for someone to do so knowing very well of the implications by doing so if he / she is in the wrong path.
as for the accused (dsai) he will only be called to enter his defence once the court satisfy that there is a case to answer. Forget about the conspiracy, let the court do their job with all their learned officials including lawyers from both parties.
today the so called doctor who examined saiful at pusrawi hospital stand by his finding and he confirmed it with the latest SD.
dsai also i believed do has his alibi and heard going to produce 4-5 winesses said to be with him at that material time.
points to ponder, the accuser i believed has an ample time to escape or to fight back. Why he didn't do so? being 40yrs younger i'm sure he could overpower anwar anytime.
why DSAI was not willing to take an oath under the Quran? is he waiting for the four witness (male) to testify first (which i don't think is any) ?
so, lets pray for the truth to prevail and may the court exercise their duty without fear or favour ( as what shown today by giving anwar the bail ). May professionalism being seen to be practices and done by all parties during the trial.
points to ponder, the accuser i believed has an ample time to escape or to fight back. Why he didn't do so? being 40yrs younger i'm sure he could overpower anwar anytime.
why DSAI was not willing to take an oath under the Quran? is he waiting for the four witness (male) to testify first (which i don't think is any) ?
so, lets pray for the truth to prevail and may the court exercise their duty without fear or favour ( as what shown today by giving anwar the bail ). May professionalism being seen to be practices and done by all parties during the trial.
may i submit
No comments:
Post a Comment